Early John Deere Engines and Running Gear

General help and support for your Lindeman through 2010 John Deere crawler
Post Reply
User avatar
Canuck 420c
440 crawler
440 crawler
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:20 pm
Location: Milton,Ontario,Canada
Contact:

Early John Deere Engines and Running Gear

Post by Canuck 420c » Tue Apr 01, 2025 5:26 pm

Hi folks,
I have a question in regards to the engines and running gear on early John Deere crawlers and wheeled tractors M,40,420 ect.... what was the mechanical differences between each series up to the 440? as i have seen later JD ads stating the "New John Deere Engine" in the ads.I aways thought that the engines and running gear were pretty much the same from the MC onward wich was the same for other early two cylinder John Deere tractors
Nothing Crawls Like a Deere

User avatar
Stan Disbrow
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 2983
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Early John Deere Engines and Running Gear

Post by Stan Disbrow » Wed Apr 02, 2025 7:19 am

Hi,

Early ones were a bit smaller displacement in the M and 40. Later ones were a little larger in the 420. 430 and 440. You can tell by the water pump the larger ones have and the smaller ones do not.

Transmissions were originally 4-speed and later 5-speed. Then came the gear reverser and, later, the differential one.

If you sit down and read thru the parts catalog, you can see where this was all a series of running changes within each model number or letter. There never was a really good break from X to Y in most things until the JD350 came along to supplant the 1010. Then, I think they reused about four bolts total.... ;)

Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!

Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11108
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Re: Early John Deere Engines and Running Gear

Post by Lavoy » Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:50 am

Yes and no. M and 40 were same displacement, 40 has bigger rod bearings, aluminum pistons, fan shround, and spins faster. 420, 430, 440 were all same displacement, 430/440 blocks were different because of RH side dipstick. Late 440 gas was higher compression, different head, small carb change, and spins faster. Many, many transmission changes, final drive changes, gearing changes, etc throughout the years, and things were just built different between the models, options that were introduced on later crawlers, as well as running changes that would be serial number specific to the model in question. There is no real easy answer.
Lavoy
Parts and restoration for antique and late model John Deere crawlers.
Owner and moderator www.jdcrawlers.com

User avatar
Canuck 420c
440 crawler
440 crawler
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:20 pm
Location: Milton,Ontario,Canada
Contact:

Re: Early John Deere Engines and Running Gear

Post by Canuck 420c » Sun Apr 06, 2025 5:41 pm

Thanks for the help gentleman

This is the ad from 1956 that has me asking this question

Image
Nothing Crawls Like a Deere

User avatar
Stan Disbrow
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 2983
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Early John Deere Engines and Running Gear

Post by Stan Disbrow » Mon Apr 07, 2025 7:13 am

Hi,

The '20' in all the new 3-digit model numbers signified a 20% increase in engine power from the predecessor 2-digit model numbers (i.e 420 v 40, 520 v 50, etc)

In this case, an increase that meant they now needed a water pump for cooling.

Note that a power increase doesn't hold for the 430 which followed the 420. That was a styling change.

Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!

Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests